E R T A

Protecting Your Company from Money Laundering and Financial Crime Risk

  • Published by

    Erta Audit

  • Type

    Bulletin

  • Date

    October 13, 2026

  • Reference

    ertadenetim.com

Protecting Your Company from Money Laundering and Financial Crime Risk

Financial crime risks, management responsibilities, and key control measures for companies.

FOR COMPANY OWNERS AND CEOs

Protecting Your Company from
Money Laundering and Financial Crime Risk

What you need to know, your responsibilities, and 10 risk-reducing steps — based on legislation current as of October 2026

Why should you read this guide?

When money laundering is mentioned, most executives think of banks, jewellers or major criminal organisations. Yet ordinary companies engaged in genuine business activities can also be used as vehicles in laundering schemes. A supplier invoice, money introduced by a shareholder as a “loan”, or an advance received from abroad can place your company, without your knowledge, in the middle of a risky transaction.

In such a case, managers, shareholders or employees who knowingly participate in the process may face personal criminal liability. The company’s banking relationships and commercial reputation may also be adversely affected.

3–7 years
Imprisonment for the offence of money laundering (Turkish Penal Code Art. 282/1)
558,595
Suspicious transaction reports submitted to MASAK in 2024
≈ TRY 965 mn
Penalties imposed in 2024 compliance inspections

Do not confuse these three concepts

Concept
Who does it apply to?
Example
Statutory MASAK obligations
Only obliged parties listed in the legislation (banks, jewellers, real-estate intermediaries, accountants, etc.)
Customer identification, suspicious transaction reporting, document retention
Criminal liability
Everyone, but only to the extent of their own act and intent
Knowingly laundering or accepting proceeds of crime (Turkish Penal Code Art. 282)
Banking and commercial risk
Everyone, through the internal policies of banks and business partners
Requests for additional documents, transaction delays, termination of the relationship

In one sentence

Even if your company is not an “obliged party” under MASAK legislation, knowing and documenting from whom you receive money, to whom you make payments, and where the funds come from is the most effective good practice for protecting yourself against both criminal and commercial risk.

Scope of responsibility

This guide is for general information purposes only; it does not constitute a legal opinion or advisory service and reflects the legislation in force as of 08.10.2026. For specific cases, please consult your accountant and legal adviser. The author cannot be held responsible for consequences arising from decisions taken on the basis of the information in this guide.

1. What is money laundering?

Money laundering is the concealment of the origin of assets derived from crime and giving them the appearance of legitimate income. The process generally takes place in three stages:

1  PLACEMENT
Introducing criminal proceeds into the system: cash deposits, jewellery, shell-company revenue
2  LAYERING
Obscuring the trail: multi-layer transfers, false invoices, shareholder current accounts, crypto
3  INTEGRATION
Giving the money an appearance of legitimacy: capital increase, real estate, dividends, repayment of a “loan”

Figure 1. The three stages of money laundering

Company transactions may also be used as instruments in the second and third stages: invoices that do not reflect genuine transactions, shareholder current accounts, capital increases and foreign trade are typical examples.

Connection with tax evasion

Tax-evasion offences under Article 359 of the Tax Procedure Law may, where their legal elements are met, be considered predicate offences to money laundering. Therefore, the risk of false invoices may give rise not only to tax penalties but also to the risk of a money-laundering investigation. According to MASAK’s 2024 statement, suspicious transaction reports most frequently involved suspicions of tax evasion, illegal betting and acting on behalf of another person.

2. How can your company be used as a “vehicle”?

The situations below are examples frequently encountered in practice. None of them is a crime on its own, but each warrants further scrutiny.

Situation
Why is it risky?
A new customer places a large order above market price and wants to pay in cash
The source of the cash cannot be traced. A later request for a “refund” of the excess amount may be used to give the funds an appearance of legitimacy.
A supplier says, “Make the payment to another company’s account”
The invoicing party and the payment recipient are different. This creates shell-company and fraud risk.
A shareholder or acquaintance wants to inject a large amount into the company as a “loan”
If the source of the funds is not documented, the company may become the channel through which suspicious money enters the system.
A foreign buyer pays far above the value of the goods
This is a known method of trade-based money laundering through mispricing.
A customer wants to pay with crypto assets
The use of crypto assets in payments is prohibited under the CBRT Regulation. The source and ownership may also be unclear.
“Consultancy” invoices unrelated to your business activities are received
The risk of false or misleading documents (Tax Procedure Law Art. 359) may arise together with money-laundering risk.

3. Eight warning signs

Ensure that your sales, purchasing and finance teams inform management when they encounter the following situations:

1Unjustified high-value cash collections
2Payment from a shareholder / related party account
3High-value invoice unrelated to business activity
4Undocumented capital contribution / shareholder loan
5Request to make payment on behalf of a third party
6Sanctions-list / high-risk-country connection
7Proposal to pay with crypto assets
8Frequent changes of shareholder / management

Figure 2. Warning signs management should know — examples only; none constitutes a crime or suspicion on its own

Good-practice rule

Collections and payments should, as a rule, be made through the bank accounts of the parties named in the contract and invoice.

If a third-party account is to be used, the legal and economic rationale for the transaction should be questioned, evidence of authority or connection should be obtained, and the transaction should be subject to approval.

Note: Payment of a debt by a third party is legally possible under Article 83 of the Turkish Code of Obligations. This rule is not a statutory prohibition, but a risk-reducing internal control recommendation.

4. Who may be liable, and why?

Criminal liability is personal (Turkish Penal Code Art. 20). Everyone is responsible only to the extent of their own act and intent; title or position alone does not create liability. The table below shows which conduct may give rise to liability for whom.

Which conduct may create liability for whom?

Who?
Conduct
Possible consequence
Condition
Manager / shareholder
Knowingly laundering proceeds of crime through company transactions
Turkish Penal Code Art. 282/1: 3–7 years’ imprisonment and a judicial fine
Intent and participation in the act
Employee
Knowingly participating in the laundering process
Liability as principal or accomplice under Art. 282
Intent and participation
Accountant / professional
Knowingly participating in laundering in the course of professional activity
Art. 282/3: penalty increased by half
Intent and commission in the course of professional activity
Person acting before an obliged party
Failing to give prior written notice that they are acting on behalf of another person in a transaction requiring identification before an obliged party such as a bank, jeweller or vehicle dealer
Law No. 5549 Art. 15: 6 months–1 year imprisonment or judicial fine
Elements of Law No. 5549 Arts. 3/2 and 15
Company (legal entity)
Commission of the offence for the benefit of the company
Not a criminal penalty but a security measure (Turkish Penal Code Art. 60): e.g. revocation of an operating licence for activities subject to public authorisation, confiscation
Statutory conditions; may not apply where disproportionate

Other important criminal provisions

Act
Penalty
Knowingly purchasing, accepting, possessing or using proceeds of crime (Turkish Penal Code Art. 282/2)
2–5 years’ imprisonment
Financing of terrorism (Law No. 6415 Art. 4)
5–10 years’ imprisonment
Failure to comply with an asset-freezing decision (Law No. 6415 Art. 15/1; for WMD decisions, Law No. 7262 Art. 5/3)
6 months–2 years’ imprisonment or judicial fine; where applicable, an administrative monetary penalty for the company

Common mistake: conducting company business through personal accounts

Conducting company transactions through the personal accounts of shareholders, employees or relatives creates serious risks in terms of identifying the true parties to the transaction, the accuracy of accounting records and the prevention of money laundering.

If the transaction meets the conditions set out in Article 15 of Law No. 5549, criminal liability may also arise. This practice is also frequently questioned in bank controls.

5. Is your sector an “obliged party”?

Some sectors are directly subject to obligations such as customer identification and suspicious transaction reporting. In these sectors, breaches may result in administrative monetary penalties of varying amounts depending on the type of breach and category of obliged party, and some breaches may also lead to criminal penalties. For example, for non-financial obliged parties, the 2026 penalty for each breach of the customer due diligence obligation is TRY 284,449.

Your sector
Obliged party?
Bank, payment and electronic money institution, financing, factoring, insurance, brokerage firm
YES — broadest set of obligations
Crypto-asset service provider
YES
Jewellery, precious metals and stones trade
YES
Intermediation in real-estate purchase and sale
YES
Purchase and sale of motor vehicles, marine vessels and aircraft
YES
Transport of cash or valuables (from 13.02.2026)
YES
Sports clubs, postal and cargo companies, trade in historical artefacts and works of art
YES
Most manufacturing, trading and service companies
NO — but criminal law, sanctions rules and banking risks still apply

This table is a summary; for scope and thresholds, the current text of Article 4 of the Regulation on Measures should be taken as the basis.

Your accountant is also an obliged party

Self-employed certified public accountants and sworn-in certified public accountants are obliged parties under this legislation. Their requests for information and documents regarding your identity and ownership structure are a statutory requirement; in higher-risk situations, they may also ask about the source of funds. They are required to report suspicious situations to MASAK and may not disclose that they have made such a report to anyone other than inspection authorities and courts (Law No. 5549 Art. 4/2). Providing your accountant with complete information protects you most.

6. What changed in October 2026?

With the amendment published in the Official Gazette dated 07.10.2026, the thresholds at which banks and other obliged parties must carry out identification procedures were doubled:

Identification thresholds doubled

Before 07.10.2026
185k
→
370k
General transaction (single/linked)
Before 07.10.2026
15k
→
30k
Electronic transfer
Before 07.10.2026
15k
→
30k
Crypto-asset transfer
Before 07.10.2026
15k
→
30k
Crypto-asset service provider transactions

Figure 3. Identification thresholds

  • For general transactions, the threshold increased from TRY 185,000 to TRY 370,000.
  • For wire transfers / EFT and crypto-asset transfers, the threshold increased from TRY 15,000 to TRY 30,000.
  • When banks authenticate internet and mobile transactions using one-time SMS codes, they may, subject to certain conditions, dispense with obtaining a signature specimen.

What this means for management

This change may be viewed as a technical update intended to compensate for the decline in the real value of the thresholds due to inflation. There is, however, no monetary threshold for suspicious transaction reporting.

As SMS-based authentication becomes more widespread, the security of the phone numbers registered with banks for company representatives becomes increasingly important.

In 2026, companies transporting cash and valuables were also added to the list of obliged parties (February). MASAK also began publishing UN sanctions lists on its website (September).

7. Sanctions lists and crypto assets

Sanctions lists

Under UN Security Council resolutions and Türkiye’s decisions concerning the financing of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction, the assets of certain persons and entities may be frozen. Failure to comply with an asset-freezing decision and knowingly providing funds to listed persons are criminal offences (Law No. 6415 Art. 15; Law No. 7262 Art. 5). The scope of prohibited transactions depends on the relevant decision. For companies engaged in foreign trade, checking new customers and suppliers against sanctions lists is an important good practice.

New customer / supplier / partner
→
List check (MASAK notices, Official Gazette decisions)
→
Match?
→
If yes: suspend the transaction, seek legal advice
→
Document the check

Figure 4. Sanctions-list screening for a new business partner (good practice)

Crypto assets

Prohibition on payment with crypto assets

Under Article 3 of the CBRT Regulation on the Disuse of Crypto Assets in Payments, crypto assets may not be used directly or indirectly in payments. Receiving or paying consideration for goods or services in crypto assets falls within this prohibition; conducting the transaction through a platform does not change the result.

  • If the company intends to acquire crypto assets for investment purposes using company funds, the service provider’s authorisation should be verified through the official announcements of the Capital Markets Board of Türkiye (CMB). Inclusion in the CMB list of operating entities does not, by itself, mean that the entity is authorised.
  • Such transactions should be subject to a board resolution and all records should be retained (good practice).
  • Crypto-funded capital or shareholder loans coming from a “shareholder’s wallet” should not be accepted unless the source is documented (good practice).

8. Why is your bank asking questions?

Banks are required to know their customers, monitor transactions and report transactions they consider suspicious to MASAK. A question such as “What is the purpose of this payment?” is an ordinary part of that obligation and does not, by itself, mean that a suspicion exists. Banks’ internal policies may also go beyond the statutory minimum requirements.

Possible situations and how to prepare

What may happen?
How can you prepare? (good practice)
The bank requests documents and delays the transaction
Keep the contract, invoice and board resolution ready in advance for high-value transactions
The bank files a suspicious transaction report
Use clear transaction descriptions (“Invoice No. X — raw material payment” instead of simply “payment”)
The transaction is postponed or assets are frozen
Maintain an orderly archive of documents showing the source of income; act together with your lawyer and accountant
The bank terminates the relationship
Reduce the use of cash and personal accounts; conduct company business through the company’s bank account

Reporting, postponement and freezing are not the same thing

A bank filing a suspicious transaction report does not mean that the account will automatically be blocked. Postponement of transactions (Law No. 5549 Art. 19) and freezing of assets (Laws No. 6415 and 7262) are separate processes with different legal bases and decision-making authorities.

Keep under review

MASAK has been working on a regulation that would require the purpose of high-value wire transfers / EFT transactions to be declared in greater detail. As of the date this guide was prepared, the final effective status of the regulation had not yet been confirmed. If it enters into force, the importance of transaction descriptions will increase.

9. Management’s 10-step checklist

For companies that are not obliged parties, this list does not constitute a statutory requirement; it consists of risk-reducing good-practice recommendations. You can review it at your next management meeting; every “No” answer points to an area for improvement.

#
Control
Status
1
Collections and payments are, as a rule, made through the accounts of the parties named in the contract and invoice; exceptions are handled with documented justification and approval
☐ Yes ☐ No
2
Company business is not conducted through the personal accounts of shareholders, employees or relatives
☐ Yes ☐ No
3
The identity, address and ownership of new customers and suppliers are checked
☐ Yes ☐ No
4
Foreign-trade counterparties are checked against sanctions lists
☐ Yes ☐ No
5
There is a written upper limit and policy for cash collections
☐ Yes ☐ No
6
The source of funds received from shareholders is documented; the source of funds is queried in capital increases
☐ Yes ☐ No
7
Invoices unrelated to the business or appearing suspicious are questioned before payment
☐ Yes ☐ No
8
Requests to change IBAN details are verified by calling back a known telephone number
☐ Yes ☐ No
9
Crypto assets are not used for collections or payments (CBRT prohibition); investment transactions are conducted with authorised entities whose authorisation has been verified and pursuant to a board resolution
☐ Yes ☐ No
10
There is a channel through which employees can report suspicious situations without fear of retaliation
☐ Yes ☐ No

Conclusion

Managing money-laundering risk does not require large budgets. What is needed is clear rules, documented transactions and open communication with your accountant.

For more detailed information, you may refer to the technical version of this guide (Compliance Guide for Accounting Professionals and CFOs).

Principal Legal and Regulatory References

Subject
Source
Money-laundering offence, measures applicable to legal entities, principle of personal criminal liability
Turkish Penal Code Arts. 20, 60, 282
MASAK obligations and Article 15
Law No. 5549; Regulation on Measures (latest amendment Official Gazette 07.10.2026/33393)
Financing of terrorism and WMD proliferation, asset freezing
Law No. 6415 Arts. 4, 15; Law No. 7262 Art. 5; MASAK Communiqué No. 34
Prohibition on payment with crypto assets
CBRT Regulation on the Disuse of Crypto Assets in Payments (Official Gazette 16.04.2021/31456)
Statistics
MASAK 2024 data (via Anadolu Agency); 2026 administrative monetary penalty amounts (Ministry of Treasury and Finance)

Muhsin GÜNYELİ

Sworn-in CPA · Independent Audit Partner